LET'S TALK
UX Design·2024·Pulse Health·London, UK

Pulse Health

A digital health platform with 200,000 users and a patient portal that hadn't been touched since 2019. Four years of accumulated debt, and users who had learned to work around its failures. We started from their workarounds.
16
Weeks
200k
Users
87%
Task Completion
4.7★
App Store
SCROLL
PROJECT OVERVIEW
SERVICES
  • UX Research
  • Service Design
  • UI Design
  • Design System
  • Usability Testing
CLIENT
Pulse Health
DURATION
16 weeks
LOCATION
London, UK
YEAR
2024

A digital health platform with 200,000 users and a patient portal that hadn't been touched since 2019. Four years of accumulated debt, and users who had learned to work around its failures. We started from their workarounds.

THE CHALLENGE

Healthcare UX fails in a predictable way: it prioritises clinical accuracy over human comprehension. Pulse had a portal that was technically correct and practically unusable. Users were calling their GP to do things the portal was supposed to handle. We had to make the designed version easier than calling a human.

RESEARCH

START WITH THE WORKAROUNDS

Before touching any design, we spent three weeks in research. Forty-two user interviews. Three rounds of usability testing on the existing portal. We mapped every workaround users had developed — these are the true design requirements.

The most common workaround: users photographed their own appointment details because they couldn't trust the portal to show them at the right time. That became our first design problem to solve.

U
USER JOURNEY MAP
42 interviews, 8 personas, 3 critical flows
DESIGN SYSTEM

CONSISTENCY AS CARE

We built a design system from scratch — 94 components, 12 pattern templates, a full token structure. In healthcare, inconsistency doesn't just frustrate users. It erodes trust. Every component had to be accessible to WCAG AA as a baseline.

C
COMPONENT LIBRARY
94 components, 3 states each
C
COLOUR TOKENS
System, semantic, and component levels
A
ACCESSIBILITY
WCAG AA baseline, AAA where possible

A design system is only as good as the decisions it makes for you. This one makes the right call by default and makes the wrong call impossible.

Felix Romero, Frontend Dev
OUTCOMES

NUMBERS THAT MATTER

Task completion rate went from 31% to 87% in usability testing. Average task time dropped by 64%. GP call volume for portal-related queries dropped by 40% in the first month post-launch.

P
PATIENT PORTAL — OVERVIEW SCREEN
Redesigned appointment, prescription, and messaging flows

The App Store rating moved from 2.1 to 4.7 stars in six weeks. The most common review category changed from "broken" to "finally works."

THE PROCESS
01

RESEARCH

Three weeks of field research, user interviews, and competitive analysis. No assumptions. The brief was wrong in four places — research found them all.

02

SYSTEM

Design system before screens. We built the token structure, component library, and pattern library before designing a single page. Six weeks of infrastructure work that saved twelve weeks of screen-level rework.

03

VALIDATE

Three rounds of usability testing with real Pulse users — including elderly users, users with low digital literacy, and users with visual impairments. Iterated after each round.